A film could be a potential fit for me. One reason happens to be that the final product is merely intended to be two minutes in length, as it is to serve as an opening. A magazine, on the other hand, happens to require more than an opening. To me, an opening is really a title page of contents...enough said. However, a magazine will not only request a title page coupled with a table of contents, but rather an additional article---per person, per issue, while maintaining an equivalent house style. Further, there is also additional software that is required if one is to set out to create a living, breathing magazine that I am not aware of just yet.
Although, there are issues with choosing to make a film as well that were described in my previous blog post that arise due to my particular skillsets. The act of filming with various shots, angles, and editing, is truly a foreign and highly tedious process in my opinion. The writing in the magazine, I feel, would exemplify my skillsets better in this regard. Finally, films require more people in contrast to a magazine. (Actors, Writers, Directors, Editors)
No comments:
Post a Comment